Minnesota Sues Feds Over Evidence in Fatal Border Patrol Shooting

Minnesota State Capitol in St. Paul during winter snowfall. Photo by Fibonacci Blue. License: CC BY 2.0.

Minnesota officials filed a federal lawsuit seeking to preserve evidence and restrict federal actions following the fatal shooting of a Minneapolis ICU nurse by U.S. Border Patrol agents. The legal move comes days after the death of 37-year-old Alex Pretti during an immigration enforcement operation, an incident that has drawn protests and intensified scrutiny of federal use of force. State leaders say the lawsuit is necessary to protect the integrity of the investigation and maintain public trust.

The complaint was filed in federal court on January 25, 2026, naming the Department of Homeland Security and related agencies. It marks a sharp escalation in the conflict between Minnesota authorities and federal officials over how the shooting is being handled.

What the State Is Demanding

Minnesota’s lawsuit asks the court to order federal agencies to preserve all physical, digital, and documentary evidence connected to the shooting. State officials argue that evidence could otherwise be lost, altered, or placed beyond the reach of local investigators who are legally responsible for examining deaths that occur within the state.

The filing also seeks limits on certain federal enforcement actions connected to the operation, arguing that continued activity could interfere with witness cooperation and scene integrity. According to the state, federal agents restricted access to key evidence in the immediate aftermath of the shooting, even as state investigators sought to begin their review.

Background of the Shooting

Alex Pretti was killed during a Border Patrol operation in Minneapolis that was part of a broader federal immigration enforcement push. Federal officials have said agents fired in self-defense after perceiving a threat, a claim that has been disputed by community members and local leaders.

Video circulating publicly appears to show Pretti holding a phone rather than a weapon at the time he was shot. State and city officials have cited that footage as a reason for independent review, stressing that all available evidence must be examined before conclusions are drawn. Investigations remain ongoing, and no final determinations about the agents’ actions have been released.

Growing Tension Between State and Federal Authorities

The lawsuit reflects deepening tension between Minnesota leaders and federal agencies over immigration enforcement in the Twin Cities. State officials say the federal government is operating without sufficient transparency, while federal authorities insist their agents acted lawfully and within their mandate.

Minnesota Attorney General Keith Ellison has framed the legal action as a jurisdictional issue as much as an accountability issue, emphasizing that state authorities cannot be sidelined when a civilian is killed within state borders. Federal officials, meanwhile, have pushed back against claims of obstruction, saying internal reviews and federal investigations are already underway.

Community Impact and Broader Significance

The shooting and subsequent lawsuit have fueled protests across Minneapolis, with residents demanding accountability and clearer limits on federal law enforcement power. Vigils and demonstrations have highlighted Pretti’s work as a healthcare professional and the shock felt by colleagues and neighbors.

Legal experts say the case could have lasting implications for how evidence is handled when federal agents are involved in civilian deaths. For now, the lawsuit underscores unresolved questions surrounding the shooting and the broader debate over oversight, transparency, and trust between communities and law enforcement. The court’s next steps are expected to shape how the investigation proceeds in the days ahead.

References: AP News | PBS NewsHour: Minnesota and the Twin Cities Sue the Federal Government to Stop Trumps Immigration Crackdown